DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOID AGREEMENT AND VOIDABLE CONTRACT

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOID AGREEMENT AND VOIDABLE CONT ⇒ A contract is an associate agreement enforceable by law. In different words, a contract is an associate agreement reached by two competent parties through a proposal and its acceptance to undertake to or to not do one issue, supported by valid thought and object. the associate agreement that fails to satisfy the wants of a sound contract or is expressly declared ‘void’ at a lower place varied sections of the Act does not represent a sound contract. it’s ‘voidable’ once one party holds the authority to make it ‘void’ due to varied reasons, that unit mentioned later.

The terms void and voidable unit are typically misunderstood and used interchangeably. Whereas there is a unit some parallels between void and voidable contracts, their unit important distinctions that have to be understood. the foremost underlined distinction between void agreement and a voidable contract is that void contracts unit those who unit unenforceable by law, whereas voidable contracts unit those who unit enforceable at the selection of a celebration to the contract. This text aims to specialize in different important variations and describe the styles of contracts that unit void, and other people that are unit voidable.

VOIDABLE CONTRACT

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOID AGREEMENT AND VOIDABLE CONT ⇒ A rescindable contract is one that was and continues to be a legal contract until the displeased party repudiates their concurrence, and thereby, causes it to be not enforceable.

According to Section 2(i) of the Indian Contract Act 1872, “An agreement that’s enforceable by law at the choice of 1 or a mound of the parties to it, still not at the choice of the contrary or others, might be a rescindable contract.” The contract will be avoided or declared rescindable beneath the posterior cases-

  1. Absence of free concurrence (Section nineteen and 19-A) a festivity to the contract, whose concurrence was not free or taken beneath Coercion, overdue influence, falsity, or fraud, has the choice to avoid or take ack their concurrence.
  2. interference of Performance by the contrary party (Section53) once a festivity is clotted by the contrary party from fulfilling their complementary pledge (or a contingent event on that it hinges), that forms the study for the contract), the party in question gets a right to be salaried for any loss caused and to avoid the contract. to bear the associate degree illustration, A lets his house to B for one time for an associate degree in agreement volume still does not pass the keys of the house throughout the parcel quantum. throughout this case, B is entitled to avoid the contract.
  3. Failure to perform the contract at intervals the quested time (Section55) once a festivity intends time to the substance of the contract and also the pledge is not completed at intervals the quested time, the prophet is entitled to avoid the contract.

VOID AGREEMENT

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOID AGREEMENT AND VOIDABLE CONT ⇒ A void ‘agreement’ refers to that is void-ab-initio or void from the terribly starting. it’s naturally, unlawful and unenforceable and its breach does not entitle the displeased party to any legal remedy. Contrary thereto, avoid ‘contract’ is one that was valid within the starting, still ceases to be enforceable latterly on. As an Associate in Nursing illustration, a contract to vend a one-of-a-kind oil price bucks would come void, if once the contract is created, it’s destroyed by fireplace. Section 2 (g) of the Indian Contract Act defines void agreement as “ An agreement not enforceable by law is claimed to be void.”

  • Some styles of agreements are specifically listed as void by the Indian Contract Act, 1872. though they satisfy the conditions of a sound contract, they cannot be executed.

An agreement or contract with no legal value. A void agreement or contract means that it is no longer enforceable by law.

  • An impaired individual or an inebriated person may not be coherent enough to adequately grasp the parameters of the agreement, rendering it void.
  • Agreements entered into by minors or for illegal activities may also be rendered void.
  • A void contract could be a formal agreement that’s effectively illegitimate and unenforceable from the instant it’s created.
  • A void contract differs from a revokable contract, though each might so be invalidated for similar reasons.
  • A contract could also be deemed void if it is not enforceable because it was originally written.
  • Void contracts will occur once one in every one of the concerned parties is incapable of totally comprehending the implications of the agreement, like when a mentally impaired individual or a soused person might not be coherent enough to adequately grasp the parameters of the agreement, rendering it void.
  • Agreements entered into by minors or for illegal activities can also be rendered void.

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOID AGREEMENT AND VOIDABLE CONTRACT

BASIS FOR COMPARISON VOID AGREEMENT VOIDABLE CONTRACT
MEANING AN AGREEMENT UNENFORCEABLE BY LAW CONTRACT IN WHICH EITHER OF THE TWO PARTIES HAVE AN OPTION TO ENFORCE OR RESCIND IT
DEFINED IN SEC 2(j) OF THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT 1872 SEC 2(i) OF THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT 1872
NATURE VOID AB INITIO CONTRACT IS VALID UNTIL THE PARTY WHOSE CONSENT IS NOT FREE DOES NOT RESOLVE IT
ENFORCEABILITY UNENFORCEABLE CAN BE ENFORCED ON THE AFFIRMATION OF THE AGGRIEVED PARTY
EXAMPLE AN AGREEMENT WITH A PERSON WHO IS DISQUALIFIED FOR ENTERING INTO THE CONTRACT BY LAW A SELLS HIS LAND TO BE FOR RS.100,000 UNDER COERCION

CASE LAWS RELATED TO VOID AGREEMENT

  1. GHERULAL PARAKH V. MAHADEODAS MAIYA AND OTHERS (26 MARCH 1959)
  2. VIRENDRA SINGH V. LAKSHMI NARAYAN (1 NOVEMBER 2006)
  3. RAM NAGINA SINGH V. GOVERNOR-GENERAL IN COUNCIL (2 SEPTEMBER 1949)

IN ALL THE ABOVE CASES IT WAS HELD THAT AGREEMENT NOT ENFORCEABLE LAW IS SAID TO BE VOID.

IN THESE CASES THE OBJECT OR CONSIDERATION OF AN AGREEMENT IS SAID TO BE VOID.

CASE LAWS RELATED TO VOIDABLE CONTRACT

  1. BHAGWAN DAS METALS LTD. V. M/S RAGHAVENDRA AGENCIES
  2. BROADWAY CENTRE V. GOPAL DAS BAGRI (1 FEB 2002)

IN THESE ABOVE CASES IT WAS HELD THAT A CONTRACT IS VOIDABLE ON THE ACCOUNT OF PROMISOR’S FAILURE TO PERFORM IT OR ON HIS INTENTION TO DO SO. IT CAN BE ENFORCED OR RESCINDED IN THE ACCOUNT OF PROMISOR WILL.

CONCLUSION

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN VOID AGREEMENT AND VOIDABLE CONT ⇒ To conclude, a void agreement and a revocable contract have distinct connotations and legal consequences. A void agreement could be a dead agreement because it lacks any legal backing, whereas a revocable contract is also de jure enforceable. Some styles of agreements area unit declared void by law because of them being unlawful and opposition public policy, and additionally to guard the life and liberty of individual persons. Not solely that, however, it additionally aims to guard persons WHO area unit susceptible to be exploited, like ‘minors’ and ‘lunatics.’  Likewise, some ‘agreements’ area unit selected as ‘voidable’, to permit a celebration autonomy to repudiate their consent if it were caused by fraud, deception, coercion, and undue influence.

  • As an Associate in Nursing example, if an individual during a position to dominate another person causes that person to execute a contract, a similar is often unacknowledged by the dominated party. If there has been no such provision, it might result in gross injustice and unfairness. Hence any contract shaped unwittingly, involuntarily, or by unlawful suggests that is unenforceable during a court of law.

Read This Also

DEATH PENALTIES SHOULD BE REGARDED UNCONSTITUTIONAL OR NOT

Share This Content

Leave a Comment